Objective: To shed light on the current controversy regarding the best treatment option for managing urachal anomalies in children.
Patients and methods: A retrospective follow-up of a case series comprising 13 children who were diagnosed with urachal anomalies was performed. All cases were diagnosed between 2000 and 2011 and followed up at the Pediatric Urology Unit of San Cecilio University Hospital in Granada (Spain). Information about the baseline and follow-up variables was collected from clinical records.
Results: Nine of the 13 patients were symptomatic (6 patients with urachal cysts and 3 patients with urachal persistency). Conservative management was originally used in all but one case. During follow-up, reinfection appeared in two cases, and these patients were treated surgically. Spontaneous resolution was achieved in eight cases (61.5%). Two children with persistent urachal cysts are still being followed (4 and 6 years after the diagnosis), although ultrasound monitoring reveals a gradual reduction in the size of the cysts. The median time between diagnosis and resolution was 16.5 months.
Conclusion: With the exception of cases in which there is a clear indication for surgery (i.e. reinfection), a conservative approach based on regular monitoring may be useful.
Keywords: Children; Infection; Urachal anomalies; Urachal cyst.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.