CAPS paper
Multi-institutional follow-up of patients with congenital diaphragmatic hernia reveals severe disability and variations in practice

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.01.032Get rights and content

Abstract

Background/Purpose

Survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) have a high incidence of morbidity. Variability in follow-up practices between institutions may affect perception of disability and prevent population-based outcome analysis.

Methods

A survey of follow-up practices at 16 centers within a population-based CDH network was performed. A descriptive analysis of outcomes (minimum 24 months postdischarge) of CDH survivors from the 2 largest centers was performed.

Results

The nature of follow-up of CDH survivors was highly variable in 12 of 16 responding centers, ranging from ad hoc, community-based, and pediatrician-sponsored follow-up to a single perinatal center-based multispecialty CDH clinic. Outcomes at 24 to 36 months were reported from the 2 largest centers (n = 44). Among survivors, neurodevelopmental disability was most common (12/44; 27%) followed by gastrointestinal (9; 20.5%), pulmonary (5; 11.4%), musculoskeletal (5; 11.4%), and cardiac (2; 4.5%). Additional surgery was required in 17 patients (38.6%), including recurrent CDH repair in 7 (15.9%). Five patients (11.4%) had hearing loss. Among 41 children with available 24-month data, 32 (78%), 17 (41.5%), and 14 (34.1%) patients had weights below the 50th, 25th, and 3rd percentiles, respectively.

Conclusion

Congenital diaphragmatic hernia survivorship is associated with significant disability. Standardization of follow-up practices is essential to enable population-based outcomes analysis.

Section snippets

Methods

A questionnaire that specifically sought descriptive details of CDH follow-up at all 16 Canadian perinatal centers that treat CDH was sent to each site. The questionnaire focused specifically on the following attributes of CDH follow-up: (1) whether follow-up was conducted systematically or in an “ad hoc” manner; (2) whether follow-up occurred through a “single-stop,” dedicated multispecialty clinic vs single or multispecialty follow-up through individual clinics; (3) who was identified as the

CDH follow-up practices across CAPSNet centers

Twelve (75%) of 16 CAPSNet centers completed the survey. Of these, only 1 center (B) used a true “one stop” multispecialty and interdisciplinary CDH clinic based at the CAPSNet center. Five of 12 centers reported multidisciplinary follow-up at the specialized center that was decentralized across multiple clinics (eg, surgery, specialty pediatrics, and neonatology). In the remaining centers, follow-up was largely community based under the coordination of a general or specialty pediatrician, with

Discussion

There has been a steady improvement in CDH survival over the past 20 years. This improvement has resulted from a number of practice changes including preoperative stabilization, delayed surgical repair, and the development of new therapies for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension [13], [14]. As CDH survival has improved, so too has the awareness of a need to consider long-term outcomes in the assessment of the quality of care provided. Numerous studies have documented the frequency and

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the financial support from the Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR; MOP-69050) and the organizational support of the CIHR team in maternal infant care and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

References (31)

Cited by (55)

  • Long term outcomes in CDH: Cardiopulmonary outcomes and health related quality of life

    2022, Journal of Pediatric Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Primary vs patch diaphragm repair [30] Thirteen studies [16,26,27,31–40] investigated pulmonary hypertension in CDH survivors. Five of which were case control studies [16,27,31–33], six retrospective cohort studies [34–37,39,40], and two prospective cohort studies [26,38].

View all citing articles on Scopus

Sponsor: Canadian Institutes of Health Research (reference no: MOP69050), 160 Elgin St, 9th Floor, Address Locator 4809A, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0W9. Grants and awards information: +1-613-954-1968; e-mail: [email protected].

View full text