Outcome of children with neuroblastoma after progression or relapse. A retrospective study of the Italian neuroblastoma registry☆
Introduction
Neuroblastoma, the most common extracranial solid tumour of childhood, continues to have an unsatisfactory long-term prognosis. In fact, while approximately half of the patients have a localised tumour with high chance of cure, the remaining half present with disseminated disease and have a dismal outcome, except for infants.1
Cure of children diagnosed with neuroblastoma mainly depends on achieving complete tumour remission.2 Factors leading to tumour recurrence (progression or relapse) include inadequate therapy, inability to detect minimal residual disease and the actual incurability of some tumours by current therapeutic modalities. In case of recurrence, treatment is commonly decided on the basis of the type of recurrence, previously administered therapies, as well as on cost/benefit ratio. The literature provides scarce data on the features of recurrence, its treatment and evolution and eventual outcome. Although numerous phase I and phase II studies have evaluated salvage therapies in small cohorts of patients,3, 4, 5, 6 only one study analysed a large number of recurrences, although limited to patients with localised disease.7 More information on the features and on the clinical course of neuroblastoma patients failing front-line therapy would help clinicians to better tailor treatment strategies.
In this retrospective study we reviewed data from the Italian Neuroblastoma Registry (INBR) regarding children who experienced disease recurrence after being treated with the protocols of the Associazione Italiana di Ematologia e Oncologia Pediatrica (AIEOP).
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Inclusion criteria for this study were; diagnosis of neuroblastoma during childhood (0–14 years) between 1979 and 2004, registration in the INBR, treatment according to AIEOP8, 9, 10, 11 protocols and tumour recurrence. The INBR has been active since 1979 and includes patients with neuroblastoma diagnosed at the AIEOP centres. It has been estimated that more than 90% of the neuroblastomas expected each year in Italy are recruited through this network.12 The INBR collects information on clinical
Results
Of 1924 children registered in the INBR between 1979 and 2004, a total of 781 (40.6%) developed tumour recurrence. There were 424 children with NB progression (54.3%) and 357 with tumour relapse (45.7%), and were eligible for this study. Table 1 reports the descriptive statistics of the original INBR cohort and of the 781 study patients.
Biological data were not available for all the patients. In particular, MYCN gene was not assayed in 969 (50.3%) patients mostly diagnosed before 1992.
Discussion
Our study reports the long-term outcome of the largest ever cohort of children with neuroblastoma registered in prospective protocols to undergo disease progression or relapse. Overall, the prognosis for these patients was poor with median survival time less than 1 year, and less than 10% of children surviving more than 10 years after recurrence.
Recurrences occurred more often in association with the following presenting features: age >17 months, disseminated disease, abdominal primary site,
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Acknowledgements
We thank Giovanni Erminio Papio and Barbara Galleni for data management and assistance in statistical analyses, and Ms. Valerie Perricone for revising the English text. We are also greatly indebted to the physicians and nurses who heartily participated in the clinical care of the children enrolled in these studies.
Research support: Supported in part by grants by the Italian Neuroblastoma Foundation (S.P. and D.D.) and the Italian Ministry of Health ‘Ricerca Finalizzata – Bando Oncologia 2006’.
References (27)
- et al.
The prognostic impact of functional imaging with (123)I-mIBG in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma >1 year of age on a high-risk treatment protocol: results of the German Neuroblastoma Trial NB97
Eur J Cancer
(2008) - et al.
The recurrence patterns of stages I, II and III neuroblastoma: experience with 77 relapsing patients
Ann Oncol
(1996) - et al.
Italian Cooperative Group for Neuroblastoma: localized unresectable neuroblastoma: results of treatment based on clinical prognostic factors
Ann Oncol
(2002) - et al.
Peripheral neuroblastic tumors
- et al.
Chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or refractory neuroblastoma: a POG Phase II study
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol
(1997) - et al.
Phase II study of temozolomide in relapsed or refractory high-risk neuroblastoma: a joint Société Française des Cancers de l’Enfant and United Kingdom Children Cancer Study Group–New Agents Group Study
J Clin Oncol
(2006) - et al.
Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of 17-N-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors: a pediatric oncology experimental therapeutics investigators consortium study
Clin Cancer Res
(2007) - et al.
Impact of megatherapy on survival after relapse from stage 4 neuroblastoma in patients over 1 year of age at diagnosis: a report from the European Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation
J Clin Oncol
(1993) - et al.
Localized resectable neuroblastoma: results of the second study of the Italian Cooperative Group for Neuroblastoma
J Clin Oncol
(1995) - et al.
Italian Co-Operative Group for Neuroblastoma: disseminated neuroblastoma in children older than one year at diagnosis: comparable results with three consecutive high-dose protocols adopted by the Italian Co-Operative Group for Neuroblastoma
J Clin Oncol
(2003)
Resection of primary tumor at diagnosis in stage IV-S neuroblastoma: does it affect the clinical course?
J Clin Oncol
Expected number of childhood cancers in Italy from 2001 to 2015
Haematologica
International criteria for diagnosis, staging, and response to treatment in patients with neuroblastoma
J Clin Oncol
Cited by (106)
Pediatric high risk neuroblastoma with autologous stem cell transplant – 20 years of experience
2021, International Journal of Pediatrics and Adolescent MedicineCitation Excerpt :Currently, most institutions have adopted ASCT. One major institution still excludes ASCT after dose-intense induction chemotherapy by consolidating with radiation therapy, anti GD2-immunotherapy + granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and isotretinoin [11]. Given their clinical experience, they have discontinued from the use of ASCT, given the possible delay in the initiation of the more potent and targeted immunotherapy.
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Communication and Care for Children With Advanced Cancer
2020, Journal of Pain and Symptom ManagementNarrative review: precision medicine applications in neuroblastoma—current status and future prospects
2024, Translational Pediatrics
- ☆
Presented in part at the XII Advances in Neuroblastoma Research Conference, Chiba, Japan, May 22–24, 2008.