Discussion
The complication rate of 64% observed in this cohort is high and exceeds that of 56% previously reported in boys with proximal hypospadias.2 Prior to the former study by Long et al, lower complication rates for proximal repairs were often reported, ranging from 13% to 23%.13 14 As nearly half of complications seen in this cohort arose 2 years after first hypospadias repair, it is possible that past studies lacked adequate follow-up periods, partially accounting for the comparatively high rates seen in the current study. Long-term prospective studies regarding complications in hypospadias are required to truly determine complication rates over time.
As previously described, additional genital malformations may be associated with poor surgical outcomes, likely secondary to smaller glans, less penile skin, greater degrees of chordee, and poor urethral plate quality.8 In this study, 87% of boys presented with chordee, which has been associated with a 55% increase in complication rates.15 Additionally, as 63% of the boys presented with micropenis, tissue availability and glans quality would likely be suboptimal in many cases, requiring the utilization of more complex surgical methods during hypospadias correction. Indeed, as the data for this study were obtained from the I-DSD Registry, inherently, this cohort may be at a greater risk of complications due to the suboptimal anatomy associated with severe undermasculinization and DSD. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, however, it was not possible to collect detailed information on the quality of the urethral plate, angle of penile curvature or glans width. We would recommend that these should be introduced as aspects of standard data collection during hypospadias repairs. In addition, more detailed standard data collection regarding the precise type of surgical procedure would be useful for any future studies into complication rates.
Within this study cohort, median age at first surgery was older than the 6‒18 months recommended by the American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) and the European Association of Urology (EAU).16 17 This may be due to characteristics associated with DSD postponing hypospadias surgery. For example, malformations such as undescended testes may be corrected first (via orchidopexy) due to the risk of malignancy or functional impairment. Furthermore, due to high rates of SGA and micropenis, it is possible that some hypospadias surgeries were postponed in order to permit penile growth and reduce anesthetic risk.
SGA was the most prevalent extragenital malformation in this cohort and was seen in 23% of all boys, which may therefore contribute to the high rates of complications observed. A recent study has reported higher hypospadias reoperation rates in boys with SGA.18 That said, in our cohort, SGA alone was not sufficient to predict postsurgical complication rates as a single risk factor. This again confirms that several mechanisms may lead to complications.
No single clinical factor or combination of risk factors was significantly associated with postsurgical complication rates in this cohort. It was previously reported that boys with hypospadias and an identified AR variant were more likely to require additional operations than those with no identified AR variant.10 In our study, however, while there was a high complication rate, the presence of additional extragenital malformations, or a genetic diagnosis were not associated with risk of complication. Previous studies have excluded patients with genetic variants in their analysis, which may explain differences in reported complication rates.18 It is plausible that the high rates of extragenital malformations within the current cohort prevented an association being observed and that discrepancies in the results obtained from this study may be due to variations in genetic and biochemical testing internationally. It is possible that severe forms of hypospadias, such as those which may be reported by specialists in the care of DSD, may be part of a more complex syndrome that affects systems out-with the urogenital system, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary care in hypospadias and other DSD conditions.19
This study has several strengths. It is one of the largest of its type, offering valuable insight into the characteristics and complication risks of a rare group of individuals with hypospadias. Additionally, the use of international data allows the results gathered to be applied on a global basis, demonstrating the benefits of using networks such as the I-DSD Registry. Due to the rarity and heterogeneity of these conditions, data collected from single centers are typically limited and only applicable to a specific region. This study could therefore offer a guide for the creation of international management protocols. One limitation of this study is the variations in genetic and biochemical testing observed between clinics. Similarly, clinical definitions will differ internationally, for example, in how SGA is classified. Definition and classification variations may therefore alter result interpretation.
In conclusion, boys with proximal hypospadias in the I-DSD Registry have high rates of additional comorbidities and a high risk of postoperative complications. No clinical factors alone or in combination were significantly associated with complication rates. High complication rates with no observable cause suggest the involvement of other factors which need investigation. Further studies are needed to identify novel clinical factors which may be associated with complication rates in this complex group.