Discussion
In this study, we failed to support adequate circulation despite the use of ECMO in two cases with a preoperative diagnosis of D-TGA/IVS with restrictive atrial septum and without atrioseptostomy. We found coronary abnormalities and other concomitant deformities had an influence on the outcomes of the patients with D-TGA in the neonatal/infant intraoperative and postoperative subgroup. Although a promising ECMO weaning rate was obtained, 30-day survival of this population was frustrating.
Usually, cyanosis occurs within a few days after newborns with D-TGA/IVS were born. Among these, neonates with reduced pulmonary and systemic blood mixing opportunities (TGA-IVS with restrictive foramen ovale and/or closure of the ductus arteriosus) become symptomatic with extreme cyanosis early after birth, leading inevitably to severe hypoxia and acidosis.12 Most of these neonates can be stabilized until their arterial switch operations by means of PG and BAS, while in some institutions the BAS cannot be fulfilled in cath lab. At the most severe end of the spectrum, progressive cardiogenic shock occurs in patients with a high risk of end-organ injury, even cardiac arrest. In this condition, patients are unsuitable to undergo the surgery immediately and require extracorporeal oxygenation support preoperatively.13 Unfortunately, only a few successful reports are available on these patients.14 Although two preoperative ECMO supports failed in our study, lessons learned still need to be discussed for future success. A thoughtful approach with regard to the mode of support (veno-arterial vs veno-venous), management of extracorporeal support, as well as the timing of the arterial switch operation, may be beneficial for the outcome of patients. For example, atrioseptostomy cannot be performed in our center; so we will evaluate the neonates with D-TGA/IVS and restrictive atrial septum immediately after they are born, and decision for surgery will be made as soon as it is on demand. For the patient presenting with progressive hypoxemia and cardiogenic shock leading to oxygen debt, VA-ECMO was the first choice for saving multiple end-organ failure. On the other hand, if the patient’s cardiac function was stable, veno-venous support may be beneficial. First, it returns oxygenated blood to the right atrium, where most of it enters the right ventricle (RV) and aorta. Second, placing the ECMO circuit in parallel to the systemic circulation is physiologically identical to the TGA post-BAS condition. Third, it spares the carotid artery by internal jugular vein cannulation. Once the patient’s hemodynamic condition is stable and oxygen debt is paid off after a short duration of support (mainly lasting more than 24 hours), the arterial switch operation can be scheduled to avoid complications related to the support.
Some patients with D-TGA need cardiopulmonary function support due to left ventricular dysfunction or to combined pulmonary hypertension. For these patients, VA-ECMO can provide whole cardiac and pulmonary function assistance to help them overcome difficulties. For simple D-TGA with left ventricular dysfunction, there are two main reasons for the reversible low left ventricular cardiac output following ASO: first, myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury during extracorporeal circulation surgery leads to cardiac dysfunction; second, the postoperative left ventricle was the original functional RV, which functioned as RV with low afterload before surgery and could not adapt to the left ventricular function of the systemic circulation with much higher afterload after surgery. Such patients with D-TGA with satisfying surgical correction have good coronary artery blood supply but are temporarily unable to adapt to systemic circulation load. Although the temporary cardiac function is severely impaired, it can generally recover within 4–6 days after ECMO support.15 However, the morbidity and mortality of children with D-TGA combined with coronary artery malformations (including intramural, solitary coronary artery, and mono-coronary ostium) are high.4 16–18 In these cases, coronary artery transfer is difficult, and it is probable to cause myocardial ischemia due to cardiac infarction of the distal portion. Therefore, the mortality of the patients is greatly increased and the outcome of ECMO support is also unsatisfactory. Coronary problems, such as kinking, stretching, or thrombosis, will have a profound effect in these patients, and even sudden cardiac death may occur after ECMO weaning.18 For such cases, there is a great challenge for the surgeon, and it is necessary to fully evaluate the satisfaction of the coronary artery transfer operation when considering the ECMO indications. It has been reported that patients who require postoperative ECMO and undergo cardiac catheterization or CTA for diagnosing residual lesions or other unrecognized pathologies have better outcomes. And, the sooner the better.19 20 Unfortunately, our patients in this study had not undergone cardiac catheterization or CTA on ECMO, which should be changed in the future.
TGA combined with LVOTO as well as aortic arch deformity are risk factors of ASO death.21–24 TGA with aortic arch obstruction (AAO) is of low incidence in congenital heart diseases. Among these cases, TGA combined with IAA is even more scarce, and only limited cases were reported. Patients in the single-stage repair of TGA and IAA that requires the aortic arch reconstruction combined with arterial switch operation have been reported to have high mortality. The rate of RV hypoplasia for TGA with AAO is higher than the isolated TGA. Therefore, primary biventricular repair of TGA associated with AAO and RV hypoplasia requires ECMO support due to high mortality and postoperative right ventricular failure.22 25 TGA with aortic arch malformation had prolonged operation time, prolonged hypoperfusion time, difficult bleeding control and pulmonary hypertension.26 With concomitant repair of AAO, surgery was performed with CPB using profound hypothermic selective cerebral perfusion, and usually was accompanied by lactate elevation. If patients require a high dose of inotropes to maintain the hemodynamic stability after surgery, the initiation of ECMO should be considered as soon as possible. It is difficult to maintain adequate ECMO flow due to massive bleeding after surgery, but the oxygen debt needs to be paid off with the augmented flow as soon as possible.
Late ASO repair is challenging. Over time, the left ventricle has less chance to function as a systemic ventricle of the whole body. ECMO support could be helpful to support left ventricle for adaptation to elevated afterload. The key point for the survival of this group of ECMO patients is whether left ventricle remodeling induced by low afterload causes intrinsic change in left ventricle myocardial properties. Some patients may need long-term ventricular support, while in these cases, switching ECMO into LVADs might be an option.27
In conclusion, ECMO could be an effective modality for cardiac failure as well as hypoxemia in pediatric patients with D-TGA before cardiac surgery. A promising ECMO weaning rate was obtained but the 30-day survival rate in this population was frustrating, mainly attributed to the original anatomy of coronary arteries and concomitant deformities. Of note, preoperative ECMO support is challenging in patients with D-TGA with intact ventricular septal defect and restrictive ASD. A thoughtful approach with regard to the mode of support, management of extracorporeal support, as well as the timing of the arterial switch operation may contribute to favorable outcome.